Watermark.
Lima BOSC
Switch site 38 sites · 11 basins 8 open

Each site is one Watermark investigation. The page color says what opens; the campus line is the build on the ground — two different clocks.

MAU Maumee Basin 9 sites
2MI The Two Miamis 9 sites
SE Southeastern Basins 12 sites
NE Northeast Basins 8 sites
The page — what opens on Watermark Open · Draftfull record Queued · Watchingpreview page Restrictedrequest access
The campus — the build on the ground Investigating Confirmed Under construction Operational
All 38 sites — the network index →
Building
Chapter 3 of 6 · the story

How big is it — and what won't they tell you?

Most of this project is described in documents the developer wrote, and most of those are vague about scale. The air permit is different: to set federally enforceable pollution limits, Ohio EPA had to count the plant’s equipment, unit by unit. Read it for the shape it’s forced to disclose — and notice where it stops.

Record Teardown

Air Permit-to-Install P0138965

Ohio EPA · Division of Air Pollution Control · FINAL, issued 2026-05-28
● in the published bundle
Issued permit · text-native
① The source · annotated

Your browser can’t display this PDF inline.

Open the in-browser reader

Rendering 4132514.pdf

Download · Open in a new tab

REDACTED · CBI
1
2
3
issued PTI + 64-item Response to Comments · Ohio EPA · Air permits (eDoc 4132514)
The 66-page issued eDocument is committed as provenance; engine make/model/size is redacted in the source itself as trade secret.
② What we read
1
Synthetic-minor caps, printed in the permit
NOx 235.62 · CO 96.06 tpy
2
Three matched groups → three data halls
114 gensets · 36 towers
3
Per-engine power withheld as trade secret
ekW = REDACTED
③ What it reveals

The permit fixes the plant's shape exactly — three matched groups of generators and cooling towers, 114 data-hall gensets — yet locks the one number that sets its true scale, per-engine power, as a trade secret. The ~313 MW everyone cites is the draft public-notice figure; the issued permit will not confirm it.

④ How to check it
[open]per-engine ekW · trade secret
ekW · REDACTED · CBI Why won't the permit say how big it is?
the lock

Engine make / model / size — and so the per-engine ekW that sets the plant's true electrical scale — is claimed as a trade secret and withheld from the issued permit.

The permit fixes the plant's shape exactly — 114 data-hall gensets and 36 cooling towers in three matched groups — yet locks the one number that would let you compute its real backup capacity. The ~313 MW everyone cites is the draft public-notice figure; the issued permit will not confirm it. The scale is set; the proof is withheld.

The structure is unambiguous: three matched groups of generators and cooling towers — three data halls. The pollution caps are printed in black and white. But the single number that would convert “114 generators” into megawatts — the per-engine nameplate power — is withheld as a trade secret, so the widely-quoted ~313 MW traces only to the draft public notice, not the issued permit. Knowing which is which is the skill.

What you can read anywhere now

A synthetic-minor permit caps emissions just under the threshold that would trigger major-source review — so the caps tell you the operator’s own ceiling. Repeated equipment groups reveal layout the plans won’t. And a CBI / trade-secret redaction is not a dead end: it marks exactly which fact someone paid to keep out of the record.

Explore this in the library