Watermark.
All sites
Switch site 38 sites · 11 basins 8 open

Each site is one Watermark investigation. The page color says what opens; the campus line is the build on the ground — two different clocks.

MAU Maumee Basin 9 sites
2MI The Two Miamis 9 sites
SE Southeastern Basins 12 sites
NE Northeast Basins 8 sites
The page — what opens on Watermark Open · Draftfull record Queued · Watchingpreview page Restrictedrequest access
The campus — the build on the ground Investigating Confirmed Under construction Operational
All 38 sites — the network index →
Research · basin view

Maumee basin

HUC-8 · 04100005 – 04100009

8 sites, one watershed. Fort Wayne's headwaters, the Auglaize and Blanchard confluences, the Ottawa River draw at Lima — every intake and outfall in the basin, read against one drainage. This is a lead, not a verdict: most of the basin has no filed water record yet, and a gap below is an open question, never a zero.

Sites
8
Ohio · Indiana
[verified]
Live + building
4
Lima · Fort Wayne · Findlay · Van Wert
[verified]
Estimated IT load modeled
1015 MW
est. across 4 of 8 sites with a facility on file
[inference]
Receiving design flow
152.1 MGD
8 receiving WWTPs · NPDES
[verified]
The watershed, mapped

Every site, against the drainage it draws from

Schematic basin diagram — simplified from USGS HUC boundaries, not to scale
LAKE ERIE buried-valley aquifer draw St. Joseph / St. Marys hd. Auglaize River Blanchard River Ottawa River BOSC GCP DEF FIN TOL VWT BRY OTW
Aggregate across the basin

The receiving system — one site at a time, stacked

Cumulative receiving design flow, upstream → downstream
Running total of the WWTPs' NPDES design flows — the treatment capacity any new load in this basin lands on
Line · cumulative Receiving design flow, stacked across the basin
0 50 100 150 200 FIN BOSC OTW VWT BRY GCP DEF TOL 152.1 MGD
[verified] EPA ECHO ICIS-NPDES design flows
Site count by build phase
3 live · 1 building · 4 queued
3 Live1 Building4 Queued
Receiving WWTP design flow by site
Bar · ranked NPDES design flow (MGD)
0 50 100 Fort Wayne 74 MGD Toledo 22.5 MGD Lima 18.5 MGD Findlay 15 MGD Defiance 12 MGD Van Wert 4 MGD Bryan 3.1 MGD Ottawa 3 MGD
[verified] EPA ECHO ICIS-NPDES

4 of 8 sites carry an estimated facility load and 3 a screened facility record; none carries a filed draw volume — the water figure behind any projection is still open. The design flows above are the receiving plants' permitted capacity — the denominator any projected draw must be read against, not a measure of the draw itself. A projected basin total would be an open range, not a claim.

Drill down

The 8 sites in this basin

Routed downstream · Tier-0 Muskingum–Cunge

The design-storm peak, routed — attenuated and lagged, not summed

The 25-yr, 24-hr design storm (4.25 in) generated at each contributing subcatchment and routed down the cited confluence graph. A downstream reach sees a peak that is attenuated and delayed — not the arithmetic sum of the tributary peaks a naive stack would give.

Routed outlet hydrograph (cfs)
Ottawa River at the outlet; the dashed line marks the naive summed peak the outlet would see with no channel routing — the routed line peaks below it, and later.
Line · outlet hydrograph Routed discharge at the outlet · 25-yr storm
0 3975 7950 11925 15900 naive sum 14,674 cfs 0h 4h 9h 13h 17h 21h 25h 30h 34h 38h 42h 46h 51h 55h 59h 63h 67h 14,283 cfs
[inference] Tier-0 Muskingum–Cunge routing of the SCS design-storm hydrographs (watermark basin-route)
What routing buys over the naive sum
2.7% peak attenuation
2.8 h peak lag
14,674 → 14,283 summed → routed peak (cfs)
Per-reach attenuation + lag
Reach Length (ft) In peak Out peak Atten. Lag
Pike Run (headwater) 38,000 6,405 6,201 3.2% 0.8 h
Dug Run (headwater) 21,000 2,917 2,859 2.0% 0.6 h
Ottawa River upstream of Lima 82,000 13,479 13,348 1.0% 1.9 h
Dug Run -> Ottawa River 6,000 2,859 2,832 0.9% 0.2 h
Pike Run -> Ottawa River 4,000 6,201 6,175 0.4% 0.1 h
Ottawa River at Lima (assimilative reach / USGS 04187100) 20,000 14,311 14,283 0.2% 0.5 h
Lima supply abstraction reach (cooling draw — unbuffered bound) 12,000 13,348 13,332 0.1% 0.3 h

Tier-0 screening — constant-parameter Muskingum–Cunge over reach geometry + subcatchments that are cited where derivable (WBD watershed areas, Hack's-law channel lengths) and stated assumptions otherwise (slopes, curve numbers), not a calibrated HEC-RAS model. The attenuation + lag are robust to the absolute areas; the finding is that the routed peak is smaller and later than the sum, so a downstream reach is not sized by stacking tributary peaks.

Drill down · discharge points

Where the basin's outfalls actually are

The NPDES-permitted municipal outfalls that would receive any new load. 4 of 8 carry an assembled dilution screen; the rest discharge to ungaged tributaries or carry no ECHO receiving water — the gap is itself a finding. Each opens its site's record.

Gaps in the record: 4 of 8 sites in this basin have no filed water or facility record. The aggregate figures above count only what's on the record — read the record column before citing a basin total.