How the record was assembled — and withheld

affected Blanchard River (RM 56.42) → Auglaize River → Maumee River → Lake Erie Western Basin

affected Blanchard River watershed flood risk management and ecosystem restoration (the federal study track that runs alongside the locally-funded Hancock County Flood-Risk Reduction Program).

action renewal; receiving Blanchard River

The meeting text references One Energy/One Power Company digging in the township ROW on TR215 and a related unread letter from One Power Company concerning a drainage permit to tap into the township catch basin; no further project purpose or details are stated in the minutes. · figures: $33,269.33; $14,750.00; $55.00 (monthly service savings); $2,500 - $3,000 (initial equipment and installation costs); 3.2 mills of inside millage

action modification; receiving Blanchard River

The meeting connects to the subject "one_power" solely because One Power Company filed a complaint (Case No. 2025 CV 00168) against the Hancock County Board of Elections asserting that certified ballot language for the Allen Township Zoning Resolution was incorrect and misleading; the minutes do not name any project, site, or purpose associated with One Power Company beyond this legal filing. · figures: $157,977.59 (outstanding bills — warrants and electronic payments); $58,368.08 (OPWC funds granted to resurface TR 114 and TR 281); $17 per firemen response; $38,318.00 ('Fire-Run' payments); 3.0 mills (CEDA with City of Findlay)

The meeting connects to the datacenter subject solely through a discussion of data centers possibly being constructed in Allen Township and a subsequent motion to request a county-level moratorium on data center construction; the minutes do not name any specific datacenter project, developer, or parcel. · figures: $142,123.32; $4,821.11

The meeting text references data centers in the context of a discussion about whether county commissioners have authority to enact a countywide moratorium, and mentions an Economic Development study on data centers, but does not name any specific data center project, applicant, or location. · figures: $1,495.00 — new plants for the Judicial Center; $3,000.00 — quote to determine where the JFS roof is leaking; $1,293.84 — maintenance truck repair (vehicle 1); $4,527.37 — maintenance truck repair (vehicle 2); $754.16 — parts for dump truck spreader repairs; $2,012.04 — additional HVAC repairs at the Justice Center (change order from Bodie Mechanical)

The meeting connects to the "datacenter" corridor subject solely through Resolution #223-26, a transfer of funds within General Fund #1001 labeled "(Data Center)" for $2,000.00; the text names no project, purpose, or external party beyond this label. · figures: $2000.00 (Transfer of funds – General Fund #1001, Data Center); $2,012.04 (Additional appropriation to Capital Projects Fund #4150)

The meeting connects to the "datacenter" corridor subject solely through Resolution #247-26, which is a $1,000.00 transfer of funds within General Fund #1001 labeled "Data Center"; the document provides no further detail about the nature, purpose, or parties involved in that data center item. · figures: $748.72; $84,214.19; $11,016.67; $1,000.00; $20,000.00; $108,204.99; $151,004.40

The minutes mention a pending change order for a "Data Center HVAC installation" by ATR, but the text provides no further detail about the data center's purpose, location, ownership, or project scope beyond this single status remark. · figures: $12,357.85; $600,000; $100.00; $36,658.00; $2,919.90; $3,805.91; $5,000.00; $1,305.85; $28,500.00; $28,500.00; $175.00; $38,207.35; Thirty-one thousand dollars; $7,207.35; $3,850.00; $14,125.28; $3,790.52; $8,690.00; $13,567.00; $264,573.00; $2,375.00; $1,269,685.00; $188,650.79; $20,000.00; $120,000; two-million-dollar notes; $257,685.79; 1,405,427.06; 54,862.88; (468,893.34); (28,868.38); (1,270,617.09); 50,403.08; 4,874,248.95; 85,000.00; 888,043.09; 97,575.45

The meeting connects to the subject "one_power" solely through Resolution #472-26, which authorizes payment of a legal invoice for work related to "the appeal from One Power Company in Allen Township"; no further details about the nature, purpose, or outcome of that appeal are provided in the text. · figures: $38,000.00 (Transfer of funds within ADAMHS Fund #2013); $346.94 (Transfer of funds to Sheriff for Travel for Prisoners #1001); $0.91 (Transfer of funds within Court Technology Grant Fund #2213); $757.04 (Additional appropriation to Severance Fund #2136, Juvenile Court); $10,459.82 (Additional appropriation to Severance Fund #2136, Sheriff); $8,359.80 (Spengler Nathanson invoice no. 495322, One Power Company appeal); $2,000.00 per employee (AI Owl training cost per employee); $1,100 (additional cost, Change Order #1, Big Iron Construction LLC); $60,765 (contract total, Big Iron Construction LLC after change order); $16,100 (reduction, Change Order #1, H & H Environmental LLC); $11,490 (new contract total, H & H Environmental LLC); $244,638 (contract with Advance One Development, LLC); $84,100 (Johnson Controls Fire Protection, LP fire alarm system); $44,943.32 (Wentling Electrical Service, LLC); $11,500 (CorePre Tek quote for underground storage tank repair); $2,100 (Bowers quote for condenser compressor replacement); $1,063.96 (Best One, new tires for maintenance truck)